Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Chile

Average
Good
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,084,871 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 84.3 Immigrants from Chile.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,193 compared to $88,388, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $46,213, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $62,354, a difference of 2.9%), median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $55,954, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.0%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Average
25.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.3%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.64%), female poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Average
12.2%
Families
Good
8.8%
Average
8.9%
Males
Average
11.2%
Average
11.1%
Females
Average
13.4%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Good
11.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.56%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.2%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.0%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Good
31.2%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Poor
6.1%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%