Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ugandans

Immigrants from Chile

Average
Good
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Ugandan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,408,107 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Immigrants from Chile.
Ugandan Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $52,440, a difference of 3.0%), and per capita income ($45,047 compared to $46,213, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $103,412, a difference of 0.060%), median earnings ($47,854 compared to $47,697, a difference of 0.33%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $97,159, a difference of 0.51%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricUgandanImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,047
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,541
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,557
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,854
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,290
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,889
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,923
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,667
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,472
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,177
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.1%
Average
25.7%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.91%), single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricUgandanImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Average
12.2%
Families
Fair
9.3%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Average
11.1%
Females
Poor
14.0%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.4%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.0%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.2%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Good
28.8%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Good
11.5%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUgandanImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.0%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.5%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUgandanImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.6%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.9%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.2%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUgandanImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Tragic
61.7%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.8%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.2%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.1%
Good
31.2%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.9%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUgandanImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.9%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.8%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
6.1%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.040%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricUgandanImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.6%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.0%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.1%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricUgandanImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%