Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Immigrants from Chile
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Immigrants from Chile
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,114,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 4.4 Immigrants from Chile.
Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 50.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $103,412, a difference of 43.4%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $88,388, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $55,954, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $52,440, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $47,697, a difference of 22.5%).
Income Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Chile |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Exceptional $46,213 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Excellent $105,655 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Excellent $88,388 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Excellent $47,697 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Excellent $55,954 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Good $40,353 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Good $52,440 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Excellent $97,159 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Excellent $103,412 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Excellent $62,354 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Average 25.7% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 94.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 74.1%), and single father poverty (26.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.6%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Chile |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Average 8.9% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Good 15.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Good 15.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Good 15.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Good 11.5% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 76.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Chile |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Average 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Fair 5.5% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Chile |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Tragic 34.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 49.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Chile |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Good 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Average 46.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Good 31.2% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Chile |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Poor 89.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Poor 54.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Poor 6.1% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 137.5%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 119.6%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 111.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.50%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and 5th grade (96.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Chile |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Poor 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Fair 88.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Average 85.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 61.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 84.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.8%), and male disability (17.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.1%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Chile |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.4% |