Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,298,212 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 230.4 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $46,213, a difference of 19.2%), median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $55,954, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($123,831 compared to $105,655, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $40,353, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $62,354, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.31%), single male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.0%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.3%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 0.25%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), female disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.8%).