Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ghanaians

Immigrants from Chile

Fair
Good
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Ghanaian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,776,352 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 38.0 Immigrants from Chile.
Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 15.1%), per capita income ($42,164 compared to $46,213, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $97,159, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $40,353, a difference of 0.19%), householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $52,440, a difference of 0.29%), and median earnings ($46,440 compared to $47,697, a difference of 2.7%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,164
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,877
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,582
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Average
$46,440
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,810
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,429
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,594
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,137
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,277
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,043
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Average
25.7%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.7%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.7%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.0%
Good
11.5%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.5%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.5%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Good
31.2%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.1%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.6%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.0%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
6.1%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.9%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.40%), 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.3%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.2%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.1%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%