Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,916,913 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $62,354, a difference of 11.5%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $46,213, a difference of 9.0%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $105,655, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,304 compared to $47,697, a difference of 0.83%), median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $55,954, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $40,353, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 24.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.17%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.83%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.2%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.9%).