Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,063,785 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to a decrease of 36.1 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $52,440, a difference of 7.1%), median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $55,954, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($50,274 compared to $47,697, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $62,354, a difference of 0.94%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and per capita income ($47,489 compared to $46,213, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.1%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.64%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 14.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.7%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%).