Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Immigrants from Chile

Exceptional
Good
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,505,810 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Immigrants from Chile.
Burmese Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $103,412, a difference of 17.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $97,159, a difference of 17.0%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $105,655, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $40,353, a difference of 11.3%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricBurmeseImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Average
25.7%

Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Average
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Good
11.5%

Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.5%

Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 18.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.61%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Good
31.2%

Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.7%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Poor
6.1%

Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.2%), master's degree (19.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.4%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%