Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,488,378 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.190% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 189.7 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.5%), median male earnings ($59,527 compared to $55,954, a difference of 6.4%), and median family income ($112,038 compared to $105,655, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $52,440, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $40,353, a difference of 2.3%), and median household income ($92,098 compared to $88,388, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.1%), currently married (48.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.12%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.4%).