Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Immigrants from Chile

Poor
Good
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,375,681 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 181.5 Immigrants from Chile.
Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $46,213, a difference of 40.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $97,159, a difference of 27.5%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $105,655, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $52,440, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $62,354, a difference of 10.9%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricYakamaImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Average
25.7%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 86.5%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 69.4%), and family poverty (13.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.3%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Good
11.5%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 135.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 89.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 84.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Fair
5.5%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.8%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (44.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Good
31.2%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 113.1%), no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 66.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.6%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Poor
6.1%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 77.2%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 71.0%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.7%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.1%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%