Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,557,092 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 92.9 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $46,213, a difference of 24.2%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $55,954, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $97,159, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $52,440, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $62,354, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.12%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.65%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.2%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.8%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%).