Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sioux

Immigrants from Chile

Fair
Good
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Sioux Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,939,510 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 13.8 Immigrants from Chile.
Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $46,213, a difference of 36.2%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $88,388, a difference of 30.4%), and median family income ($82,386 compared to $105,655, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $52,440, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $40,353, a difference of 15.1%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricSiouxImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,921
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,386
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,792
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,448
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,566
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,063
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,417
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,089
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,750
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,509
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.3%
Average
25.7%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (22.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 83.8%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 78.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 26.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.7%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricSiouxImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
19.8%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
18.7%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
20.9%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.0%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
26.9%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.6%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.8%
Good
11.5%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 88.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 79.4%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSiouxImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.2%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Fair
5.5%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSiouxImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.2%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.7%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.7%), and births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.24, a difference of 8.6%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSiouxImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.5%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.52
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.0%
Good
31.2%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSiouxImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.8%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Poor
6.1%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 60.8%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 57.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricSiouxImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.6%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.4%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.0%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 36.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricSiouxImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%