Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Tsimshian
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Tsimshian
85.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Tsimshian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,193,973 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 85.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,837 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 85.8%, a difference of 0.24%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 93.3% |
| Range | 50.0% | 43.3% |
| Mean | 86.8% | 79.7% |
| Median | 86.1% | 80.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 84.2% | 75.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.6% | 90.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Tsimshian by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Lithuania (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (85.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Nepal (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Latvia (85.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (85.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Paraguayan (85.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Cypriot (85.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Liberia (85.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 85.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 85.9% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 85.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 85.9% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Ugandans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Albanians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.6% |