Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Brazil
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Brazil

Celtics

Good
Average
7,381
SOCIAL INDEX
71.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
119th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Brazil Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,261,808 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Celtics.
Immigrants from Brazil Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $43,621, a difference of 10.4%), median household income ($90,907 compared to $83,193, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,534 compared to $92,241, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.96%), householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $60,608, a difference of 2.9%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $54,242, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BrazilCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,164
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,418
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,907
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,463
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,324
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,273
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,487
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$100,534
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,470
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,364
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 23.2%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.96%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BrazilCeltic
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Average
12.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Good
8.8%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.7%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BrazilCeltic
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BrazilCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.3%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BrazilCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.2%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 26.5%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BrazilCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BrazilCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.5%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.0%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.7%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BrazilCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%