Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uruguay
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uruguay

Celtics

Fair
Average
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,647,765 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.361% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 1,360.6 Celtics.
Immigrants from Uruguay Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $60,608, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $50,447, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,682 compared to $45,732, a difference of 0.11%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $83,193, a difference of 0.77%), and per capita income ($43,997 compared to $43,621, a difference of 0.86%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UruguayCeltic
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,997
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$98,205
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,560
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,682
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,860
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,945
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Average
$52,302
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,171
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,086
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,975
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.6%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 29.7%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UruguayCeltic
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Average
12.3%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Good
8.8%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Poor
14.0%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.2%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.9%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UruguayCeltic
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.92%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UruguayCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.8%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.18%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UruguayCeltic
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.7%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 47.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 26.7%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UruguayCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (45.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.77%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UruguayCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.1%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UruguayCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%