Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ghana

Celtics

Poor
Average
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,997,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 7.1 Celtics.
Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.2%), per capita income ($41,131 compared to $43,621, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $92,241, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,641 compared to $45,732, a difference of 0.20%), householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $50,447, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($81,489 compared to $83,193, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GhanaCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,131
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,544
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,489
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,641
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,836
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,894
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,333
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$87,760
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,982
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,624
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 29.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GhanaCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.3%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GhanaCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GhanaCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.1%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and currently married (42.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.58%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GhanaCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.5%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 105.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 34.1%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GhanaCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.4%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 59.6%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GhanaCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.1%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.4%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GhanaCeltic
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%