Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Portugal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Portugal

Celtics

Poor
Average
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,247,821 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Celtics.
Immigrants from Portugal Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $60,608, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $50,447, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $38,283, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($100,984 compared to $101,139, a difference of 0.15%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $98,896, a difference of 0.31%), and median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $54,242, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PortugalCeltic
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,412
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,984
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Average
$84,740
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Good
$47,304
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,182
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,788
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,105
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,512
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,203
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,924
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PortugalCeltic
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Average
12.3%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Good
8.8%
Males
Average
11.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Average
13.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.8%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.4%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PortugalCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PortugalCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PortugalCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 45.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.7%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PortugalCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 63.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PortugalCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.9%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.1%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.2%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 0.93%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PortugalCeltic
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%