Ugandan vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,618,842 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 9.8 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 13.3%), median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $38,283, a difference of 6.8%), and median family income ($106,541 compared to $101,139, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $50,447, a difference of 0.94%), householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $60,608, a difference of 0.94%), and median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $54,242, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.82%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 10.6%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (61.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 6.6%).