Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Barbados
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Barbados

Celtics

Poor
Average
1,618
SOCIAL INDEX
13.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
295th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Barbados Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,365,875 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Celtics.
Immigrants from Barbados Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 52.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,766 compared to $60,608, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,394 compared to $98,896, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,816 compared to $45,732, a difference of 0.18%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,687 compared to $92,241, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($41,478 compared to $43,621, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BarbadosCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,478
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,419
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,989
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,816
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,795
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,685
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,163
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,687
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,394
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,766
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 52.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 50.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother poverty (30.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BarbadosCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
14.9%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
16.0%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Average
12.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.6%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BarbadosCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
24.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 42.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BarbadosCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.7%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.9%), married-couple households (39.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and currently married (40.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.11, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BarbadosCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.2%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 265.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 96.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 84.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 30.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 84.8%).
Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BarbadosCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
70.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.9%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BarbadosCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.4%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.3%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.3%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 72.9%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Barbados vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BarbadosCeltic
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.97%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.8%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%