Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Celtics
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,077,529 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 32.4 Celtics.
Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $43,621, a difference of 15.2%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $54,242, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $50,447, a difference of 0.81%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $38,283, a difference of 3.9%), and median household income ($78,327 compared to $83,193, a difference of 6.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 26.0%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Celtic |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Celtic |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 81.8% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Celtic |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.0%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.97%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Celtic |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |