Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Cuba

Celtics

Fair
Average
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,293,081 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Celtics.
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $60,608, a difference of 35.5%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $101,139, a difference of 29.2%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $43,621, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $50,447, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $38,283, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($38,426 compared to $45,732, a difference of 19.0%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CubaCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,910
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$78,249
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$68,461
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,426
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$43,461
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,291
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,374
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,701
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,662
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$44,735
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 90.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 82.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CubaCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
14.6%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.9%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.1%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
20.8%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CubaCeltic
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 36.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CubaCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.0%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.63%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (68.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CubaCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.2%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.5%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CubaCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 72.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 60.2%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CubaCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.2%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.7%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.5%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.3%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CubaCeltic
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%