Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Micronesia

Celtics

Fair
Average
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,789,036 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.821. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 83.3 Celtics.
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $43,621, a difference of 16.4%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $54,242, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $92,241, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $50,447, a difference of 0.48%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $60,608, a difference of 0.65%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $38,283, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,464
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,345
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,574
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,133
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,177
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,477
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,691
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,544
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,864
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,000
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.58%), single female poverty (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaCeltic
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.82%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.8%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.1%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.11, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.72%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaCeltic
Family Households
Average
64.2%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.1%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.0%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.8%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.2%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 66.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MicronesiaCeltic
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%