Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Celtics

Poor
Average
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,559,839 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Celtics.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $60,608, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $101,139, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $38,283, a difference of 0.94%), median earnings ($44,462 compared to $45,732, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $92,241, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.76%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.6%), currently married (43.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 195.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 67.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 20.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 46.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 61.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 89.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.65%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%