Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Celtics
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,559,839 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Celtics.
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $60,608, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $101,139, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $38,283, a difference of 0.94%), median earnings ($44,462 compared to $45,732, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $92,241, a difference of 2.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,195 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,837 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,341 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,462 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,474 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,644 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,722 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,673 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,462 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,030 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.76%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.9% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 81.8% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.6%), currently married (43.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 195.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 67.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 20.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 46.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 61.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 89.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.7% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.2% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.7% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.6% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.65%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |