Subsaharan African vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sub-Saharan Africans

Celtics

Tragic
Average
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,814,611 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Celtics.
Subsaharan African Integration in Celtic Communities

Subsaharan African vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $92,241, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $98,896, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $38,283, a difference of 0.28%), householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $50,447, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $45,732, a difference of 3.7%).
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Income
Income MetricSubsaharan AfricanCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,152
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,748
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,631
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,118
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,408
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,391
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,691
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,235
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,691
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,615
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Subsaharan African vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.9%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and single female poverty (23.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricSubsaharan AfricanCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.8%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
10.9%

Subsaharan African vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSubsaharan AfricanCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.4%

Subsaharan African vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%).
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSubsaharan AfricanCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.7%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
81.8%

Subsaharan African vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.2%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and currently married (42.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSubsaharan AfricanCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Poor
33.3%

Subsaharan African vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 51.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.3%).
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSubsaharan AfricanCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.9%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.1%

Subsaharan African vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.75%).
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricSubsaharan AfricanCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.3%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.9%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Good
1.9%

Subsaharan African vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.0%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Subsaharan African vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricSubsaharan AfricanCeltic
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%