Arapaho vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,505,906 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.621% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 620.8 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $43,621, a difference of 34.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $98,896, a difference of 30.2%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $54,242, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $60,608, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $50,447, a difference of 14.6%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 51.6%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and single female poverty (26.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 138.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 129.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 122.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 41.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.2%), family households (66.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.59%), female disability (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.8%).