Asian vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Asian
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Asians
Celtics
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Asian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,634,238 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Celtics.
Asian vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $83,193, a difference of 22.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $92,241, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $98,896, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $50,447, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $60,608, a difference of 13.6%).
Income Metric | Asian | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,057 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,955 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $101,681 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,690 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,827 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,586 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,003 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $112,666 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $118,426 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $68,822 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 27.3% |
Asian vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 29.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.0%).
Poverty Metric | Asian | Celtic |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.0% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Excellent 10.9% |
Asian vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
Unemployment Metric | Asian | Celtic |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Asian vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Asian | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.8% |
Asian vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 24.3%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (66.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Asian | Celtic |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.8% | Poor 33.3% |
Asian vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Asian | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.0% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Asian vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.83%).
Education Level Metric | Asian | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.4% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.1% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.4% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.4% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.5% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Good 1.9% |
Asian vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.64%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
Disability Metric | Asian | Celtic |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |