Luxembourger vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Celtics

Excellent
Average
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,466,408 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.262% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 262.4 Celtics.
Luxembourger Integration in Celtic Communities

Luxembourger vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $92,241, a difference of 5.4%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $101,139, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $98,896, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $50,447, a difference of 0.13%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $60,608, a difference of 0.59%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Luxembourger vs Celtic Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Luxembourger vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.2%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
Luxembourger vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerCeltic
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Excellent
10.9%

Luxembourger vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Luxembourger vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerCeltic
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%

Luxembourger vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Luxembourger vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.8%

Luxembourger vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.1%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.31%), family households (63.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Luxembourger vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Poor
33.3%

Luxembourger vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 50.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Luxembourger vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.1%

Luxembourger vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 7.4%), associate's degree (48.9% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Luxembourger vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Good
1.9%

Luxembourger vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.1%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.0%).
Luxembourger vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%