Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nicaragua
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nicaragua

Celtics

Fair
Average
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,109,417 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Celtics.
Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $60,608, a difference of 16.4%), and per capita income ($38,065 compared to $43,621, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $50,447, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $38,283, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($76,784 compared to $83,193, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,065
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,267
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,784
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,737
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,482
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,023
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,266
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,914
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,108
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,085
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 61.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 59.6%), and receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.8%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.68%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCeltic
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (67.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Good
9.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 88.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.8%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.6%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 0.65%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%