Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Guatemala
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Guatemala

Celtics

Poor
Average
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,027,608 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Celtics.
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.4%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $54,242, a difference of 17.3%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $43,621, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $50,447, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $38,283, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($75,123 compared to $83,193, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,550
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,191
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,123
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,851
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,244
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,444
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,447
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,341
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,573
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,950
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 50.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and single female poverty (24.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
15.5%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
12.0%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.9%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.6%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.81%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.1%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.5%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.8%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.8%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.5%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 38.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.8%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 119.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.8%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.2%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.1%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.80%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GuatemalaCeltic
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.1%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%