Turkish vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Turks

Celtics

Exceptional
Average
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Turkish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,994,001 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 72.0 Celtics.
Turkish Integration in Celtic Communities

Turkish vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $43,621, a difference of 20.1%), median family income ($121,202 compared to $101,139, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,318 compared to $92,241, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $50,447, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $60,608, a difference of 12.3%).
Turkish vs Celtic Income
Income MetricTurkishCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,391
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$121,202
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,389
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,919
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,253
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,695
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,266
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$110,318
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,814
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,037
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.3%

Turkish vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.7%).
Turkish vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricTurkishCeltic
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.9%

Turkish vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
Turkish vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTurkishCeltic
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%

Turkish vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Turkish vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTurkishCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
81.8%

Turkish vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 21.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (63.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Turkish vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTurkishCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Poor
33.3%

Turkish vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 44.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.5%).
Turkish vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTurkishCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Turkish vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.4%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.3%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Turkish vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricTurkishCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.7%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.5%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.2%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.9%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
1.9%

Turkish vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.0%).
Turkish vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricTurkishCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%