Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Celtics

Poor
Average
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,506,850 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Celtics.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 30.2%), householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $60,608, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $50,447, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,532 compared to $45,732, a difference of 0.44%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $92,241, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($80,722 compared to $83,193, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCeltic
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 56.7%), receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 45.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.63%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.6%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and female unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 37.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCeltic
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 219.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 81.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 23.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 52.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 73.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.7%), college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and high school diploma (85.5% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (45.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 96.3%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 53.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%