Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Costa Rica
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Costa Rica

Celtics

Fair
Average
3,937
SOCIAL INDEX
36.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
208th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Costa Rica Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,914,520 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.787. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 40.8 Celtics.
Immigrants from Costa Rica Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $50,447, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $38,283, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($101,354 compared to $101,139, a difference of 0.21%), per capita income ($43,464 compared to $43,621, a difference of 0.36%), and median earnings ($45,928 compared to $45,732, a difference of 0.43%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaCeltic
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,464
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,354
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Average
$85,054
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,928
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,237
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,186
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,643
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,876
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,141
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,848
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.79%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaCeltic
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Average
12.3%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Good
8.8%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Average
11.2%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.4%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.9%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.6%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaCeltic
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.6%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.6%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.7%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.4%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.8%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and college, under 1 year (63.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.13%), bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.69%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.5%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.0%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.90%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
5.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%