Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from the Azores

Celtics

Poor
Average
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,553,832 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.719. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.528% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to an increase of 527.6 Celtics.
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $60,608, a difference of 16.3%), per capita income ($39,608 compared to $43,621, a difference of 10.1%), and median family income ($95,402 compared to $101,139, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,322 compared to $92,241, a difference of 0.090%), median earnings ($45,812 compared to $45,732, a difference of 0.18%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,608
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,402
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,357
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,812
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,503
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,621
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,322
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,138
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,121
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 50.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.85%), single female poverty (23.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.9%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.2%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.9%), male unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.94%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 86.2%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 55.3%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.2%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.7%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.5%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and male disability (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCeltic
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%