Pima vs Paiute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,942,786 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.774% in Paiute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 774.1 Paiute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 21.0%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,066, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $72,959, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,984, a difference of 0.20%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,743, a difference of 0.47%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,056, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 57.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 53.0%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 122.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 71.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 21.0%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and college, under 1 year (51.4% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 268.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 38.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.0%).