Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Ecuador

Poor
Poor
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,871,914 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 41.1 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,195, a difference of 34.4%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $80,341, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $91,462, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,722, a difference of 4.3%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $54,030, a difference of 6.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Ecuador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Tragic
$41,195
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Tragic
$92,837
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Tragic
$80,341
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Tragic
$44,462
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Tragic
$50,474
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Poor
$38,644
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$53,722
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Tragic
$89,673
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Tragic
$91,462
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Tragic
$54,030
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
22.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 72.8%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 69.0%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
15.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 115.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 85.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 76.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Ecuador
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
6.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Ecuador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Tragic
82.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 73.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 52.6%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Ecuador
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
33.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 85.8%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 68.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 13.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 64.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Ecuador
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
23.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
76.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
40.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
13.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
4.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 49.6%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 46.9%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.78%), 11th grade (88.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Ecuador
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
90.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
84.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
81.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Tragic
58.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
42.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Tragic
34.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 62.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.6%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Ecuador
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%