Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Philippines
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Philippines

Poor
Average
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,107
SOCIAL INDEX
58.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
163rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Philippines Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,637,163 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 64.4 Immigrants from Philippines.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Philippines Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,262 compared to $93,899, a difference of 48.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $108,471, a difference of 47.8%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,000, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $57,930, a difference of 12.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,114, a difference of 16.4%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 16.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Philippines
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Average
$44,000
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$108,288
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$93,899
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$48,266
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Good
$55,809
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$41,114
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$57,930
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$102,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$108,471
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$66,161
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
24.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 138.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 128.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 110.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 45.8%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 63.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Philippines
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
18.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 144.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 130.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 115.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Philippines
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Average
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Average
5.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Philippines
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
35.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Good
82.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 69.2%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.37, a difference of 11.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Philippines
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
68.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Excellent
30.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 65.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Philippines
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
23.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 57.0%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 48.8%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.82%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Philippines
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
94.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
90.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Poor
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Fair
64.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Fair
58.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Poor
45.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Poor
36.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 66.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Philippines Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Philippines
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
48.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%