Pima vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,332,869 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.608% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 607.8 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 24.7%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,922, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $45,816, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $50,475, a difference of 0.13%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $34,106, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $40,107, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 77.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 77.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.0%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 112.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 87.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 84.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 34.1%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 22.9%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 82.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 30.6%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), female disability (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.3%).