Pima vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,006,509 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.894. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 18.1 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,383, a difference of 22.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $86,301, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $73,392, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $34,942, a difference of 1.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $81,483, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,655, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 72.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 72.1%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 181.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 124.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 105.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (65.9% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 66.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 40.0%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 38.6%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 61.0%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.7%).