Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Pakistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Pakistan

Poor
Good
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,130
SOCIAL INDEX
78.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
86th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Pakistan Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,934,358 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.710. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Immigrants from Pakistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 233.6 Immigrants from Pakistan.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Pakistan Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $114,434, a difference of 56.0%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $97,528, a difference of 54.2%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $47,084, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $56,789, a difference of 10.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,052, a difference of 21.9%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 28.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Pakistan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$47,084
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$114,406
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$97,528
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$51,693
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$60,987
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$43,052
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$56,789
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$106,129
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$114,434
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$66,617
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
27.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 134.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 128.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 119.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 48.2%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 64.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Pakistan
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
18.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
26.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 174.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 125.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 120.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Pakistan
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Pakistan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Good
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 97.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 89.4%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.30, a difference of 13.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Pakistan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
30.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
50.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Exceptional
3.30
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
49.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
27.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Pakistan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Good
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Good
6.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 92.2%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 85.9%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Pakistan
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Good
91.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
43.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
17.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 79.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 74.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 20.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Pakistan Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Pakistan
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%