Pima vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,827,331 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.920. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 25.5 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $101,580, a difference of 38.5%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $86,498, a difference of 36.7%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,826, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,610, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,498, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $92,385, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 133.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 114.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 113.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.6%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 47.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 125.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 115.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 57.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 85.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 7.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 37.1%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.24%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 51.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.1%), male disability (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.0%).