Pima vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,521,085 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 46.4 Tlingit-Haida.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,516, a difference of 42.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $97,417, a difference of 32.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $83,968, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,914, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,513, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $92,987, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 160.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 146.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 137.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 176.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 166.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 125.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 59.8%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 56.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 48.9%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.48%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 42.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.58%), disability (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.1%).