Pima vs Lithuanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Lithuanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Lithuanians
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lithuanian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,949,156 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 93.6 Lithuanians.
Pima vs Lithuanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,448, a difference of 61.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $112,484, a difference of 53.3%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $115,395, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,552, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,108, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $105,223, a difference of 27.1%).
Income Metric | Pima | Lithuanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $49,448 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $115,395 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $93,852 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $50,991 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $61,228 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $42,108 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $53,552 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $105,223 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $112,484 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $65,209 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 28.7% |
Pima vs Lithuanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 188.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 155.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 125.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 52.0%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Lithuanian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Pima vs Lithuanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 131.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 100.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Lithuanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Pima vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 12.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Lithuanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Pima vs Lithuanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 97.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 74.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Lithuanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Fair 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 29.6% |
Pima vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 6.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 12.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Lithuanian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 58.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 6.3% |
Pima vs Lithuanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 91.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 82.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Lithuanian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 88.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 68.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 42.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Pima vs Lithuanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 80.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.8%), male disability (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Lithuanian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 10.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |