Pima vs Ugandan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Ugandan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Ugandans
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ugandan Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,733,663 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Ugandans.
Pima vs Ugandan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,047, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,472, a difference of 41.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $87,557, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,923, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,889, a difference of 15.8%).
Income Metric | Pima | Ugandan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Excellent $45,047 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Excellent $106,541 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Excellent $87,557 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Excellent $47,854 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Good $55,290 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $40,889 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $50,923 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Good $96,667 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Excellent $103,472 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Average $61,177 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 24.1% |
Pima vs Ugandan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 113.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 100.9%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 33.8%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Ugandan |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Poor 14.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Poor 18.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Poor 17.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Poor 17.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Good 11.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 12.2% |
Pima vs Ugandan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 98.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 96.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Ugandan |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 12.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Pima vs Ugandan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 14.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Ugandan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 67.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Pima vs Ugandan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 80.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 71.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Ugandan |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 61.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 43.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 44.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Excellent 30.1% |
Pima vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Ugandan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Pima vs Ugandan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 85.2%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 75.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Ugandan |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Average 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.4% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Excellent 94.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Good 86.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 61.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Pima vs Ugandan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 69.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Ugandan |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |