Pima vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,810,823 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 16.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,152, a difference of 31.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,691, a difference of 23.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $77,631, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $84,235, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $48,691, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 101.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 80.6%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 123.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 89.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 0.22%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.30%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 53.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%).