Pima vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,732,472 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.322% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 322.3 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,742, a difference of 33.0%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $80,324, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,186, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $89,586, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,726, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $56,495, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 77.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 71.4%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.6%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 97.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 97.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 47.3%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.64%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 131.5%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 108.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 96.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 22.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 96.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 46.3%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.080%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 63.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 60.1%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.5%).