Pima vs European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,397,799 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 14.9 Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,836, a difference of 49.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,367, a difference of 45.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $88,751, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,796, a difference of 0.57%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,457, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $98,310, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 170.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 137.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 127.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 174.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 138.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 116.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 83.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 70.3%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 98.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and European communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 70.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 70.1%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 66.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.1%).