Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Belgium
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Belgium

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,693
SOCIAL INDEX
84.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
57th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Belgium Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,395,533 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.895. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 22.0 Immigrants from Belgium.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Belgium Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $55,082, a difference of 79.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $118,932, a difference of 62.1%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $123,831, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,830, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $44,587, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $112,575, a difference of 35.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Belgium
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$55,082
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$123,831
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$100,306
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$54,679
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$66,125
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$44,587
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$54,830
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$112,575
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$118,932
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$69,703
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
29.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 147.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 107.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 43.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Belgium
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.0%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 170.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 130.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 112.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Belgium
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 7.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Belgium
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Poor
64.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Excellent
83.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 110.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 84.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Belgium
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
28.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.3%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Belgium
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 124.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 119.2%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 110.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Belgium
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
71.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
66.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
54.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
47.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
20.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
7.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 84.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Belgium Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Belgium
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%