Pima vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,329,834 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 39.4 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,426, a difference of 48.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,913, a difference of 41.6%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,247, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,510, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,544, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 114.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 113.1%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 108.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 43.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 153.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 122.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 92.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 64.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 68.2%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 64.9%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 72.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.6%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.3%).