Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Bangladesh
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,803,668 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 34.6 Immigrants from Bangladesh.
Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,709, a difference of 36.1%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $80,722, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $92,208, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,714, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $90,448, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Poor $41,709 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $94,665 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $80,722 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Fair $45,532 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $51,642 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Good $39,910 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $54,714 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $90,448 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $92,208 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $55,394 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 20.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 71.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.2%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.1%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.0%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 16.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 20.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 31.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 121.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 113.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Good 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 10.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 30.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 70.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 80.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 101.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 66.6%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.36, a difference of 11.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 43.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.36 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Good 30.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 101.8%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 82.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 16.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 34.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 25.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 74.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 38.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 3.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 67.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 63.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.14%), 11th grade (88.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 92.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 91.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 89.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 85.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 56.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 45.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Average 37.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Average 1.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 63.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.85% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |