Pima vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,095,672 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,164, a difference of 37.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $97,277, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $83,582, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,594, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $90,137, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 99.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 78.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 31.5%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 121.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 97.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 89.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 50.3%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.9%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.7%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 67.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 63.8%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 60.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.2%).